The academic-practitioner divide in intelligence studies

The Resource The academic-practitioner divide in intelligence studies
Label
The academic-practitioner divide in intelligence studies
Statement of responsibility
edited by Rubén Arcos, Nicole K. Drumhiller, Mark Phythian
Contributor
Editor
Subject
Language
eng
Summary
"To a significant extent both the profession of intelligence and those delivering intelligence education share a common aim of developing intelligence as a discipline. However, this shared interest must also navigate the existence of an academic-practitioner divide. Such a divide is far from unique to intelligence - it exists in various forms across most professions - but it is distinctive in the field of intelligence because of the centrality of secrecy to the profession of intelligence and the way in which this constitutes a barrier to understanding and openly teaching about aspects of intelligence. How can co-operation in developing the profession and academic study be maximized when faced with this divide? How can and should this divide be navigated? The Academic-Practitioner Divide in Intelligence provides a range of international approaches to, and perspectives on, these crucial questions"--
Member of
Assigning source
Provided by publisher
Cataloging source
LBSOR/DLC
Illustrations
illustrations
Index
index present
Literary form
non fiction
Nature of contents
bibliography
Series statement
Security and professional intelligence education series SPIES
Series volume
35

Context

Context of The academic-practitioner divide in intelligence studies

Work of

Structured data from the Bibframe namespace is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License by Bates College. Additional terms may apply to data associated with third party namespaces.